Grants in Higher Education
TEAGLE FOUNDATION GRANTS IN HIGHER EDUCATION
FRESH THINKING
OTHER PROJECTS
November 2009
Project PericlesThe Periclean Faculty Leadership Program
Project Leader: Jan Liss
|
$100,000 over 28 months to develop a cohort of 30 faculty members at Periclean institutions who will champion civic engagement in the classroom, on the campus, and in the community. Faculty will develop, teach, and evaluate an academic course that incorporates issues of civic engagement, as well as organize campus-wide activities and prepare an academic paper or project. This project builds on the success of the Civic Engagement Courses program, which Teagle previously supported. |
November 2008
Union College, Bard College, Colgate University, Hamilton College, Skidmore College, and Vassar CollegeInvestigating the Utility of High-Performance Computing Capabilities at Six Liberal Arts Colleges (planning grant) | White Paper
Project Leader: Valerie Barr
|
$40,000 over 9 months to investigate how experience with powerful, high-performance computing technology can impact teaching, learning, and research (faculty and undergraduate) across a wide range of departments and programs at liberal arts colleges. |
May 2007
The American Academy of Arts and SciencesDepartmental Template Survey
Project Leader: Leslie Berlowitz
|
$75,000 over 12 months. The need for reliable, cross-disciplinary data about the humanities is generally acknowledged by those working in these fields, especially when compared to the prodigious amount of information available in science and technology. The American Academy of Arts and Sciences has already collected what data exist under the auspices of its "Humanities Indicators" project, and now seeks to gather new data that will fill in important gaps in what is known about the humanities through its new "Template Project" initiative, thereby creating a robust and useful knowledge base. The Academy will collaborate with five learned societies and the American Council of Learned Societies to survey 200-300 departments each in the disciplines of history, modern languages and literatures, art history, linguistics, and religion. Data will be collected through a template that the societies will attach to surveys they already circulate. The template questions will focus on faculty (numbers tenured, untenured, etc.; teaching load and responsibilities; graduate student teaching) and undergraduate curricula (numbers of majors, minors, interdisciplinary concentrations, courses offered, whether the department offers first-year seminars, requires a senior thesis and more). Similar data already collected from political science departments will be included in the survey results. The American Political Science Association will do the analysis. All data will be transferred to a host organization that will manage and maintain it, clean it up, and develop ways to make comparisons using this information. |
February 2007
The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of TeachingBusiness Education and Liberal Learning (BELL) Project
Project Leader: Thomas Ehrlich
|
$375,000 over 36 months. Roughly 60% of American college students are majoring in professional fields, with roughly a third of those majoring in business or marketing. Graduates in these fields, the Carnegie Foundation argues, need the capacities to understand, even foresee, social trends and needs; to be creative and innovative in their work; to play important leadership roles; to operate effectively in a global environment; to understand their own as well as other cultures; to know how to conduct themselves ethically and with integrity in their professions; and to understand the public purposes of their work. These students, in other words, need a liberal education. Yet after an initial review of more than 30 undergraduate business programs, in addition to ongoing work in other undergraduate professional fields and in the liberal arts, the Carnegie Foundation has found that attention to the core goals of liberal learning (analytical thinking, intellectual depth, ethical understanding, leadership, and creativity), though present in most programs, is limited in scope and not well integrated with other dimensions of students' training. The Business Education and Liberal Learning (BELL) project—an action research project that has as its goal widespread change in practices of teaching and learning—responds to this problem by exploring how the goals of a liberal education can best be integrated into undergraduate business programs. Having identified some promising models for the integration of business and liberal education, the Carnegie Foundation will further the work in four stages:
The total cost of this project is $900,000. In addition to Teagle's support, the Carnegie Foundation itself will contribute $375,000, and is seeking support from other funders for the remaining $150,000. |
